National Transportation Research Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Center for Transportation Analysis 20040315 vector digital data Knoxville, TN National Transportation Research Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Center for Transportation Analysis State of Florida http://www-cta.ornl.gov/transnet/MOpage.html This dataset contains geographic data for trailer-on-flatcar (TOFC) and container-on-flatcar (COFC) highway rail and/or rail-water transfer facilities in the State of Florida. Attribute data specify the intermodal connections at each facility; i.e., the modes involved in the intermodal transfer, the AAR reporting marks of the railroad serving the facility, the type of cargo (always containers/trailers), and the direction of the transfer. This dataset is an update to the 2001 FGDL layer fctf.shp. Please Note: This layer should be used in conjunction with the FGDL layer INTERMODAL.shp which also contains different types of intermodal facilities. The data was created to serve as base information for use in GIS systems for a variety of planning and analytical purposes. CTA Intermodal Terminals Database Overview The Intermodal Terminals Database (CTA data system MO) is a list of 3100 important transload facilities in the U.S. (157 facilities in Florida) where freight shipments may be transferred between surface modes. It was compiled by David Middendorf in 1998 under the sponsorship of the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, and since that time has only been augmented with new rail-truck TOFC/COFC and auto ramp terminals and to reflect post-Conrail railroad ownership. By "terminal" is meant a specific facility or site with a single operator, and not an entire port complex, which typically contains several facilities with specialized equipment for transloading different types of cargoes. In general, this terminals set excludes warehouses where goods are stored for a period pending selection of an ultimate destination, even though the warehouse may act as the shipper's consignment agent rather than as receiver of the goods. Also excluded are truck-to-air terminals operated by air freight carriers at airports and truck-to-truck terminals where packages are transferred between local delivery services and line-haul trucks. The location of each terminal is idealized as a point in the interior of the facility with longitude/latitude coordinates in decimal degrees, datum NAD27. Within the limits of subjective placement, it may be considered to have 100 m geographic accuracy, though many of the terminals represented have docks longer than 100 m, not to mention areal extent. The formal database is a single ASCII file in Oak Ridge native format, mo43.lmr, which contains a record for each facility and sub-records describing the types of transfers that occur there by cargo type, modes connected, and rail carriers. The fixed format structure of data in the file is explained in notes at the beginning of the file. (Those notes alone may be viewed here at MOnotes.txt.) All serious users should consult the database documentation which explains the logical structure, coverage, attribute codes, and sources. An easier-to-use derivative version of the database is also available in ESRI shapefile format. Users are cautioned, however, that it somewhat simplifies the data content of the native format file. The reformat program RHA available in the highway section will also support this data system "M" format. The above information was taken directly from the following CTA ORNL website: http://www-cta.ornl.gov/transnet/MOpage.html For more information on the INTERMODAL TERMINALS DATABASE: Concepts, Design, Implementation, and Maintenance Please see the following website: http://www-cta.ornl.gov/transnet/terminal_doc/index.htm 19980101 20040315 publication date Complete None planned -87.253506 -79.909285 30.715322 25.764896 None Trailer Intermodal Transportation Railroad Flatcar Pipeline TOFC COFC Waterway Terminal Container Highway Air ISO 19115 Topic Categories transportation None Florida None All serious users should consult the database documentation which explains the logical structure, coverage, attribute codes, and sources. Please Note: Contact was made with Bruce Peterson on 5/21/2009 regarding the update cycle for this layer. During this communication acknowledgement was made by ORNL/CTA that currently there is no maintenance program in existence for this layer. However, information was passed that most of the facilities have lifetimes of several decades, so most of the facilities are still operational. Additionally many rail/truck facilities have minimal capital invested and turnover a lot faster, so there is no doubt that MO is missing a lot after a decade of inattention. Because of this, this layer should be used in conjunction with the FGDL layer INTERMODAL.shp which also contains different types of intermodal facilities. National Transportation Research Center, ORNL, CTA Bruce Peterson mailing

2360 Cherahala Boulevard

Knoxville TN 37932 US (865) 946-1352 (865) 946-1314 petersonbe@ornl.gov National Transportation Research Center (NTRC) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Center for Transportation Analysis (CTA) http://www-cta.ornl.gov/transnet/Index.html The Center for Transportation Analysis (CTA) in the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Version 6.2 (Build 9200) ; Esri ArcGIS 10.7.1.11595 Center for Transportation Analysis Energy Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory INTERMODAL TERMINALS DATABASE: Concepts, Design, Implementation, and Maintenance http://www-cta.ornl.gov/transnet/terminal_doc/index.htm CTA Intermodal Terminals Database http://www-cta.ornl.gov/transnet/MOpage.html CTA Transportation Networks http://www-cta.ornl.gov/transnet/ Center for Transportation Analysis http://cta.ornl.gov/cta/ Oak Ridge National Laboratory http://www.ornl.gov/ GeoPlan relied on the integrity of the attribute information within the original data. This data is provided 'as is'. GeoPlan relied on the integrity of the original data layer's topology This data is provided 'as is' by GeoPlan and is complete to our knowledge. This data is provided 'as is' and its horizontal positional accuracy has not been verified by GeoPlan This data is provided 'as is' and its vertical positional accuracy has not been verified by GeoPlan 0 onLine Spatial and Attribute Information The Intermodal Terminals Database (CTA data system MO) was compiled by David Middendorf in 1998 under the sponsorship of the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. The dataset provides location and attribute information for use in national and regional cartographic and network analysis applications. Attribute data were extracted from the IANA 1997 Rail Intermodal Terminal Directory, the Official Railway Guide; the TTX Company Intermodal Directory; World Wide Web home pages of Burlington Northern Santa Fe, Conrail, CSX Transportation, Kansas City Southern, and Norfolk Southern; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Port Series Reports; Containerization International Yearbook; 1996 AAPA Directory; and various transportation news sources both in print and on the Internet. Attribute data reflect conditions at TOFC/COFC facilities during 1995-96 and are subject to frequent change. Some facilities may be dormant or permanently closed. The database includes TOFC/COFC facilities and marine container terminals with rail connections which were listed the IANA 1997 Rail Intermodal Terminal Directory, the January/February 1997 edition of the Official Railway Guide; the TTX Company Intermodal Directory; the World Wide Web home pages of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway, Conrail, CSX Transportation, Kansas City Southern, and Norfolk Southern; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Port Series Reports; Containerization International Yearbook; 1996 AAPA Directory; and various transportation news sources both in print and on the Internet. The database does not include TOFC/COFC and marine container facilities known to have been closed before or during 1996. However, because of the frequent turnover of this type of facility, some of the terminals included in the database may now be dormant or permanently closed. The locations of TOFC/COFC facilities were determined using available facility address information and MapExpert, a commercial nationwide digital map database and software package, and recording the longitude/latitude of the approximate center of the facility. Facility locations are not bound to any current or previous highway, railway, or waterway network models. CTA 19980101 In general, this file reflects 1998 data as left by David Middendorf, with 2002 updates of TOFC/COFC terminals, and with 2004 post-Conrail railroads updated and new TOFC/COFC terminals. CTA 20040315 The GeoPlan Center downloaded the CTA Intermodal Terminals Database on May 18th, 2009 from the following website: http://www-cta.ornl.gov/transnet/MOpage.html The data was downloaded as a zipfile. The uncompressed shapefile was originally named moun.shp and it contained 3104 records. The shapefile was defined as decimal degrees, datum NAD27. Next the shapefile was reprojected to the FGDL NAD83 HARN Albers projection. Next a selection was made for features falling within the boundary of the State of Florida. This selection set was extracted and named as FCTF_MAR04.shp Next the attribute table was uppercased. Next GeoPlan Center added and populated the following fields; -CITY -ZIPCODE -COUNTY -USNG_FL_1K -DESCRIPT -FGDLAQDATE Please Note: Contact was made with Bruce Peterson on 5/21/2009 regarding the update cycle for this layer. During this communication acknowledgement was made by ORNL/CTA that currently there is no maintenance program in existence for this layer. However, information was passed that most of the facilities have lifetimes of several decades, so most of the facilities are still operational. Additionally many rail/truck facilities have minimal capital invested and turnover a lot faster, so there is no doubt that MO is missing a lot after a decade of inattention. Because of this, this layer should be used in conjunction with the FGDL layer INTERMODAL.shp which also contains different types of intermodal facilities. GeoPlan 20090518 Data imported to ArcSDE and exported as a shapefile. GeoPlan 20090608 Vector Entity point 157 NAD 1983 HARN Florida GDL Albers 24.0 31.5 -84.0 24.0 400000.0 0.0 coordinate pair 0.0001 0.0001 meter D North American 1983 HARN GRS 1980 6378137.0 298.257222101 FCTF_MAR04 FCTF_MAR04.DBF CTA OBJECTID Internal feature number. ESRI Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated. Shape Feature geometry. ESRI Coordinates defining the features. AJID Terminal Identification Number. CTA JLON Longitude CTA JLAT Latitude CTA NAME Intermodal Terminal's Facility Name. CTA STATUS The Status of the Facility. CTA O Open CTA C Closed CTA W Warehouse CTA SOURCE Source of the original information. CTA CARGO1 Indicates the first type of cargo that is involved in the transfer. CTA 100 CTA CONTAINERIZED CARGO: cargo shipped in various international and domestic containers and cargo shipped intermodally in highway trailers. 210 CTA FOOD PRODUCTS 220 CTA LUMBER & WOOD: e.g., logs; lumber; mahogany; plywood; pulpwood; timber; and wood posts, poles, and piling. 230 CTA METAL PRODUCTS: e.g., iron and steel bars, beams, coils, pipe sections, plates, sheets, slabs, & tubes; aluminum and other non-ferrous metal products. 240 CTA MACHINERY: e.g., engines & turbines, farm machinery, construction & earth moving equipment, industry machinery, electric power generators, military equipment, & other heavy equipment. 250 CTA MOTOR VEHICLES: automobiles, buses, trucks, vans. 260 CTA PULP & PAPER PRODUCTS: e.g., fiberboard, paperboard, or pulpboard; linerboard; newsprint; paper rolls; recycled or waste paper; wallboard; & wood pulp. 280 CTA LIVESTOCK 290 CTA OTHER BREAKBULK CARGO: appliances, auto parts, cotton, electronics, rubber products, and other non-containerized goods not elsewhere classified. 310 CTA COAL 320 CTA GRAIN: barley, corn, oats, rice, rye, sorghum, soybeans, wheat. 330 CTA METALLIC ORES & BULK METALS: misc. ferrous & non-ferrous ores, ferroalloys, pig iron, scrap metal. 350 CTA CEMENT and/or Fertilizers 391 CTA CHEMICALS: e.g., fertilizers, plastic granules & pellets, resin powders, synthetic fibers. 392 CTA DRY EDIBLES: e.g., alfalfa pellets, citrus pellets, feeds, flour, meal, peanuts, raw sugar, seeds, starches. 393 CTA BULK MINE: Sand & Gravel, Salt. 410 CTA CRUDE OIL 420 CTA PETROLEUM PRODUCTS 491 CTA CHEMICALS (also 440) 492 CTA LIQUID EDIBLES (also 450) CARGO2 Indicates the second type of cargo that is involved in the transfer. See CARGO1 for value definitions. CTA CARGO3 Indicates the third type of cargo that is involved in the transfer. See CARGO1 for value definitions. CTA CARGO4 Indicates the fourth type of cargo that is involved in the transfer. See CARGO1 for value definitions. CTA CARGO5 Indicates the fifth type of cargo that is involved in the transfer. See CARGO1 for value definitions. CTA CARGO6 Indicates the sixth type of cargo that is involved in the transfer. See CARGO1 for value definitions. CTA MODE1 The first MODE code for the facility. This code identifying the two modes of transportation involved in the intermodal connection and the direction type of the intermodal transfer between these two modes. MODE TYPES = (A) Air, (H) Highway, (P) Pipeline, (R) Railroad, (W) Waterway. DIRECTION TYPES = (1) A unidirectional transfer bewteen the first mode and the second mode, (2) A bidirectional transfer between the two modes. (EXAMPLE 1: H2W - Highway with a bidirectional transfer to a waterway) (EXAMPLE 2: R1P - Railroad with a unidirectional transfer to a pipeline). CTA MODE2 The second MODE code for the facility. This code identifying the two modes of transportation involved in the intermodal connection and the direction type of the intermodal transfer between these two modes. MODE TYPES = (A) Air, (H) Highway, (P) Pipeline, (R) Railroad, (W) Waterway. DIRECTION TYPES = (1) A unidirectional transfer bewteen the first mode and the second mode, (2) A bidirectional transfer between the two modes. (EXAMPLE 1: H2W - Highway with a bidirectional transfer to a waterway) (EXAMPLE 2: R1P - Railroad with a unidirectional transfer to a pipeline). CTA MODE3 The third MODE code for the facility. This code identifying the two modes of transportation involved in the intermodal connection and the direction type of the intermodal transfer between these two modes. MODE TYPES = (A) Air, (H) Highway, (P) Pipeline, (R) Railroad, (W) Waterway. DIRECTION TYPES = (1) A unidirectional transfer bewteen the first mode and the second mode, (2) A bidirectional transfer between the two modes. (EXAMPLE 1: H2W - Highway with a bidirectional transfer to a waterway) (EXAMPLE 2: R1P - Railroad with a unidirectional transfer to a pipeline). CTA MODE4 The fourth MODE code for the facility. This code identifying the two modes of transportation involved in the intermodal connection and the direction type of the intermodal transfer between these two modes. MODE TYPES = (A) Air, (H) Highway, (P) Pipeline, (R) Railroad, (W) Waterway. DIRECTION TYPES = (1) A unidirectional transfer bewteen the first mode and the second mode, (2) A bidirectional transfer between the two modes. (EXAMPLE 1: H2W - Highway with a bidirectional transfer to a waterway) (EXAMPLE 2: R1P - Railroad with a unidirectional transfer to a pipeline). CTA RR1 Association of American Railroads (AAR) reporting mark of the primary rail carrier involved in the intermodal connection. CTA RR2 Association of American Railroads (AAR) reporting mark of the secondary rail carrier involved in the intermodal connection. CTA CITY The city in which the Intermodal Terminal Facility is located. GeoPlan ZIPCODE The zip code in which the Intermodal Terminal Facility is located. GeoPlan COUNTY The county in which the Intermodal Terminal Facility is located. GeoPlan USNG_FL_1K Facility's 1-kilometer United States National Grid (USNG) address. The USNG is an alpha-numeric reference system based on the UTM coordinate system and is similar to the Military Grid Reference System. Use of the USNG ensures a uniform grid mapping and positional reporting system for search and rescue, emergency planning, response, and recovery. How to Read a United States National Grid (USNG) Spatial Address Website - http://www.fgdc.gov/usng/how-to-read-usng/index_html GeoPlan DESCRIPT Based on the Field NAME. GeoPlan FGDLAQDATE The date FGDL acquired the data from the Source. GeoPlan AUTOID Unique ID added by GeoPlan GeoPlan Florida Geographic Data Library (FGDL) mailing

431 Architecture PO Box 115706

Gainesville Florida 32611-5706 US For FGDL Software: http://www.fgdl.org/software.html Technical Support: http://www.fgdl.org/fgdlfeed.html FGDL Frequently Asked Questions: http://www.fgdl.org/fgdlfaq.html Web site: http://www.fgdl.org Mailing list for FGDL: http://www.fgdl.org/fgdl-l.html DOWNLOADABLE DATA The Florida Geographic Data Library is a collection of Geospatial Data compiled by the University of Florida GeoPlan Center with support from the Florida Department of Transportation. GIS data available in FGDL is collected from various state, federal, and other agencies (data sources) who are data stewards, producers, or publishers. The data available in FGDL may not be the most current version of the data offered by the data source. University of Florida GeoPlan Center makes no guarantees about the currentness of the data and suggests that data users check with the data source to see if more recent versions of the data exist. Furthermore, the GIS data available in the FGDL are provided 'as is'. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center makes no warranties, guaranties or representations as to the truth, accuracy or completeness of the data provided by the data sources. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center makes no representations or warranties about the quality or suitability of the materials, either expressly or implied, including but not limited to any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center shall not be liable for any damages suffered as a result of using, modifying, contributing or distributing the materials. A note about data scale: Scale is an important factor in data usage. Certain scale datasets are not suitable for some project, analysis, or modeling purposes. Please be sure you are using the best available data. 1:24000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the county level. 1:24000 data should NOT be used for high accuracy base mapping such as property parcel boundaries. 1:100000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the multi-county or regional level. 1:125000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the regional or state level or larger. Vector datasets with no defined scale or accuracy should be considered suspect. Make sure you are familiar with your data before using it for projects or analysis. Every effort has been made to supply the user with data documentation. For additional information, see the References section and the Data Source Contact section of this documentation. For more information regarding scale and accuracy, see our webpage at: http://geoplan.ufl.edu/education.html 20200302 National Transportation Research Center, ORNL, CTA Bruce Peterson mailing

2360 Cherahala Boulevard

Knoxville TN 37932 US (865) 946-1352 petersonbe@ornl.gov FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata FGDC-STD-001-1998 local time