East Central Florida Regional Planning Council 20110930 Version 1 vector digital data Altamonte Springs, FL East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Brevard, Flagler, Lake, Marion, Orange, Osceola, Seminole, Sumter, Volusia http://cfgis.org/ Polygons representing generalized future land use for East Central Florida Regional Planning Council. Represent the generalized future land use for Osceola County and its municipalities. 20110401 20110630 publication date Complete As needed -82.556709 -80.387102 29.690474 27.627264 None Planned Development COM Office-Residential Development MH Medium Density Residential Tourist Commercial Mixed Use Low Density Residential Airport Industrial Semi-Suburban High Density Residential Recreation / Open Space SF Medium Density Residential Open Space /Conservation Office Semi-Rural SF Low Density Residential Community Center IND Commercial RH Institutional Public Buildings and Grounds REC OFF Education Agricultural UNK Hotel / Motel / Timeshare Park / Open Space (REC) MU Public / Institutional LOD Industrial (IB) Industrial Highway Commercial RM Mixed Use (MU) WAT Water Body RR Institutional Suburban PD INST Unknown Rural Residential Commercial General Development MF High Density Residential Recreational RL Very Low Density Residential Neighborhood Center PUD Regional Commercial Rural Enclave Agriculture / Rural Medium Density Residential Rural / Agricultural CONS No Data /None RVL Conservation Overlay AG Urban Expansion Areas Conservation Utility ISO 19115 Topic Categories farming None Florida Central Florida FL Osceola County Kissimmee East Central Florida St. Cloud None All provided GIS data is to be considered a generalized spatial representation which is subject to revisions. The feature boundaries are not to be used to establish legal boundaries or entitlements. For specific information, contact the appropriate department or agency. This information is provided as a visual representation only and is not intended to be used as a legal or official representation of legal boundaries or entitlements. The user assumes all responsibility for determining whether this file is appropriate for a particular purpose. 186.803 Use of geographic information by governmental entities.--When state agencies, water management districts, regional planning councils, local governments, and other governmental entities use maps, including geographic information maps and other graphic information materials, as the source of data for planning or any other purposes, they must take into account that the accuracy and reliability of such maps and data may be limited by various factors, including the scale of the maps, the timeliness and accuracy of the underlying information, the availability of more accurate site-specific information, and the presence or absence of ground truthing or peer review of the underlying information contained in such maps and other graphic information. This section does not apply to maps adopted pursuant to part II of chapter 163. East Central Florida Regional Planning Council mailing and physical

309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000

Altamonte Springs FL 32701 US 407.262.7772 407.262.7788 Monday to Friday - 8:30 AM / 5:00 PM Version 6.2 (Build 9200) ; Esri ArcGIS 10.7.1.11595 East Central Florida Regional Planning Council: http://www.ecfrpc.org/ GeoPlan relied on the integrity of the attribute information within the original data. This data is provided 'as is'. GeoPlan relied on the integrity of the original data layer's topology This data is provided 'as is' by GeoPlan and is complete to our knowledge. This data is provided 'as is' and its horizontal positional accuracy has not been verified by GeoPlan This data is provided 'as is' and its vertical positional accuracy has not been verified by GeoPlan 0 onLine Spatial and Attribute Information ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Osceola County, Kissimmee and St. Cloud. Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet. Aligned future land use polygons using parcels file from March 2004 as basemap. Created, cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use polygons. Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use categories for Central Florida region. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32701 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788 ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION * Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December 2004. * Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff. * Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005. * Release date: September 5, 2005. * Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for data covering the specified calendar year. * Document_ sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange, Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update. * Processing methodology: - First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as _ reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended. - Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial photographs were used as visual reference. - Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU / Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date Mod field updated with the date of the updating. - Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 631 N. Wymore Rd Suite 100 City: Maitland State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32751 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: (407) 623-1075 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (407) 623-1084 Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: New Updating Process Steps Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original file ECFRPC 2005 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the shape file. Geometry of file was repaired. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original file ECFRPC 2006 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel layer (2005) was used for reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized and the DATE_MOD attributes were checked for format consistency. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the shape file. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: C:\DOCUME~1\claudia\LOCALS~1\Temp\xml8.tmp ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: This update is relevant from Apr 1, 2007- June 30, 2007. The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: Updated FLU files, Comp Plan amendments from June 30, 2007 through October 31, 2007. The updates made to the FLU file included updating of Comprehensive Future Land use changes both small and large scale for the relevant time period. A query was received from DCA that contained all adopted FLU amendments for the six counties that were included in this release. The query contained information about the amendment including Jurisdiction, DCA number, Mod FLU, County, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, and any additional notes. Amendments that were found Not In Compliance by DCA were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process that included checking for spelling errors and ensuring that all relevant files were properly populated. This also includes checking the abbreviations for the GEN_FLU field. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of November 1st through December 31st, 2007 (4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC. There was no comprehensive plans included in this update in either the small or large scale category. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through April 1st, 2008 (1Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through July 1st, 2008 (2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st, 2008 to December 31st(3Qt to 4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: Osceola County FLU file Updated based on 2008 Osceola County Property Appraiser Parcel File. At the start of the 2009 year, the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council identified Osceola County as the next county to undergo FLU realignment and data collection. The ECFRPC determined to use the Parcel file received from the Osceola County Property Appraiser as the base for the update. The ECFRPC then contacted all jurisdictions within the county to obtain a copy of the most recent Future Land Use Map or GIS shapefile. Osceola County, City of Kissimmee, and City of St Cloud all supplied GIS format shapefiles of the FLU for their respective cities. A PDF map document of the Reedy Creek Improvement District was downloaded via their website. The ECFRPC began started the process with the Counties Future Land Use file. A select by attributes followed by a select by location was used to select parcels whose centroids were present within the FLU file provided by the county and the parcel was given the corresponding FLU classification. Each FLU category was completed independently and was individually checked to ensure that parcels were correctly selected. Split parcels or parcels needing to be "cut" were then edited to reflect the county FLU categories. The fields were populated by the ECFRPC through the use of a crosswalk table, allowing for the completion of the regional FLU field. This same process was used for both the city of Kissimmee and the city of St. Cloud, in cases where there was a conflict between the city and county on the FLU category, priority was given to the city. The ECFRPC utilized aerial photographs, past FLU files, and parcel data to help accurately select the parcels that should be given the FLU category. In the case of the Reedy Creek Improvement District, the FLUM was georeferenced and parcels were selected based on the PDF image. Upon completion of the parcel identification for Future Land Use, the ECFRPC then added in the missing ROW and Water Body polygons to complete a uniform FLU polygon for the county. The Water bodies and ROW were then checked by the ECFRPC and cuts/splits were made based on Aerial Photographs and past data. The ECFRPC then performed a clean on the file to remove any sliver polygons and to dissolve the parcels sharing similar FLU categories together. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: Osceola County Future Land Use 2009 1st and 2nd Quarter Updating. The ECFPRC received a complete list of all comprehensive plans with a letter of Intent from DCA, that have been approved. The comprehensive plans were then checked on a parcel by parcel basis and future land use changed where indicated in the comprehensive plan amendment document. The changes were made by utilizing aerial photographs, parcel lines, and when needed past FLU files. The FLU file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC only. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: Osceola County Future Land Use 2009 3rd Quarter Updating. The ECFPRC received a complete list of all comprehensive plans with a letter of Intent from DCA, that have been approved. The comprehensive plans were then checked on a parcel by parcel basis and future land use changed where indicated in the comprehensive plan amendment document. The changes were made by utilizing aerial photographs, parcel lines, and when needed past FLU files. The FLU file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC only. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of October 1st through December 31th, 2009 (4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2010 (1Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: ECFRPC Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: Florida Postal_Code: 32701 Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This update includes 1 Large Scale Amendment and 1 Small Scale Amendment Change. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2010 (3QT & 4QT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This update includes 1 Large Scale Amendment and 2 Small Scale Amendment Change. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2011 (1stQT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This update includes 0 Large Scale Amendment and 5 Small Scale Amendment Change. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Osceola): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2011 (2QT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. There were 0 large scale comprehensive plan changes and 0 small scale changes in this update, resulting in no changes for this amendment cycle. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ECFRPC ---------------Process_Step (Orange): Process_Description: For the 2009 4 QT update the Orange County file has undergone a realignment. The process was initially began by contacting the Orange County Property Appraiser and receiving the most current parcel file. This parcel file served as the base for all updates occurring to the future land use map. All values occurring in the county were then added to the parcel file which had the additional required fields associated with the ECFRPC regional future land use field classifications. Once the counties FLU had been added to the parcel file, each additional jurisdiction in the county was contacted and the most recent future land use map or shapefiles were sent to the ECFRPC. For consistency the ECFRPC continued to use the Orange County parcel file as the base and populated the fields in the parcel file with the information attained from each city. The ECFRPC then collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Orange County, Apopka, Bay Lake, Belle Isle, Eatoville, Edgewood, Lake Buena Vista, Maitland, Oakland, Ocoee, Orlando, Windermere, Winter Garden and Winter Park. The future land use file was then used to populate the parcel file, providing a completed and consistent future land use file for the county. In any instance where the city and county showed a disagreement about the future land use of a parcel, the cities future land use was utilized unless a previous comprehensive plan had been adopted. For each of the previously noted comprehensive plans that had been entered by the ECFRPC, the future land for the parcel was compared to the comprehensive plan and depending on date of last update was changed to reflect the comprehensive plan change. The ECFRPC reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet. Cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use polygons. For classifications that do not follow parcel lines the scale used to cut the shape of the designation was 1 inch = 0.05 miles. Usually conservation designations, when necessary aerial imagery and jpg images are used. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32701 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788 ---------------Process_Step (Orange): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of October 1st through December 31th, 2009 (4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Orange): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2010 (1Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: ECFRPC Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 cranes roost Blvd. Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: Florida Postal_Code: 32701 Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 ---------------Process_Step (Orange): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. For this quarter there were 0 Large Scale Amendments and 7 Small Scale Amendments. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Orange): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2010 (3Qt & 4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. For this quarter there were 58 Large Scale Amendments (Orlando Amendment contained roughly 50 individual ordinance changes) and 14 Small Scale Amendments. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Orange): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2011 (1Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. For this quarter there were 12 Large Scale Amendments and 11 Small Scale Amendments. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Orange): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2011 (2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. For this quarter there were 0 Large Scale Amendments and 1 Small Scale Amendments. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ECFRPC ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Lake County, Astatula, Clermont, Eustis, Fruitland Park, Groveland, Howey-in-the-Hills, Lady Lake, Leesburg, Mascotte, Minneola, Montverde, Mount Dora, Tavares and Umatilla. Used available parcels shapefile as basemap to align future land use shapefile. Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet. Created, cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use polygons. Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use categories for Central Florida region. Metadata for ECFRPC LU Project. Original data source: Downloaded from cfgis.org website, on May 1, 2005. GIS tasks force: GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. For East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to August 5, 2005. Release date: August 8, 2005. Update statues: First update of Future Land Use GIS data for District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. Documents sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange, Osceola, Seminole and Volusia County. Used all adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter County. All comprehensive plan amendments are in compliance by Florida Department of Community Affairs. FLU file was updated and completely redone using the Lake County 2007 Parcel File. Steps of update are listed in Spatial Process Step 6. This new file update includes the Comprehensive Plan Changes made during April 1, 2007 and June 30, 2007. Processing methodology: Used ESRI ArcGIS 9.1 software to update the shapefiles. First step, major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as a reference points to locate future land use polygons to be amended. Second step, amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons using cutting tool in ArcMap, to match adopted ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial pictures were used as visual references. Final step amended polygons were labeled with the corresponding East Central Florida Planning Council and DCA number, when available. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32701 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788 ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION * Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December 2004. * Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff. * Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005. * Release date: September 5, 2005. * Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for data covering the specified calendar year. * Document_ sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange, Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update. * Processing methodology: - First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as _ reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended. - Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial photographs were used as visual reference. - Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU / Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date Mod field updated with the date of the updating. - Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: New Updating Process Steps Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original file ECFRPC 2005 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the shape file. Geometry of file was repaired. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original file ECFRPC 2006 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies were checked and corrected (including the format for the DATE_MOD field). Also, all fields were capitalized. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the shape file. Based on a new parcel shapefile released by the county for 2007, all of the cities are out of alignment. The county parcels, however, still match up with this FLU shapefile. To help automate the realignment for the cities, we developed the following methodology. First, using Arc Map 9.1 we ran a clip on our FLU file using the updated parcel file. Next, we overplayed the clipped layer over the original FLU file and selected any polygons that were inadvertently clipped out from the original layer. Next, we exported these selected polygons to a new layer. Then, we ran the multipart to single part tool on this new file. Then we created a field with the same name in both this resulting layer, and the original clipped layer. The field was called ROW_POLY because many of the lost polygons were ROW's. This field (in the clipped_export_singlepart layer) was populated with Y and then this layer was merged with the clipped layer. This process turned all misaligned polygon areas into slivers in the adjacent parcel. We then corrected all slivers that were a result of the merge (had a Y populating the ROW_POLY field). This process was completed for all cities other than Leesburg. The cities will be revisited to correct the remaining polygons that are not aligned with the new parcel file. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: Lake County Future Landuse file was completely redone using the 2007 parcel file from Lake County. This file will first be released in the April 2007- June 2007 file release. This process allowed for the County to be completely realigned and now be based on parcel lines. The process involved the creation of several new fields including GEN_FLU. These new fields were then populated using the data available in the new Lake County Parcel file. Most of the changes that took place were done using the FLU2025 field that was already in the parcel file. The Wekiva Protection Area and the Green Swamp Protection area were also added to this file to complete the GEN_FLU categories. Water Bodies were later added to the file. Once these files had been populated ECFRPC staff used the crosswalk table to verify and create the GEN_FLU field. All other fields were populated using the Parcels field or the previous version of the FLU. Although the previous version was not the base of this file, the process steps and its metadata are included to help show the steps involved in the process. The County areas have now been aligned based on the parcel file but the jurisdictions have not yet been transformed in the same process. The jurisdictions will begin to undergo changes in the next relevant FLU update cycle. This is the reason why some of the edges between the county and the jurisdiction are Unknown and do not properly line up. After alignment the FLU approved amendment changes were incorporated into the new aligned file. This update is relevant from Apr 1, 2007- June 30, 2007. The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: Updated FLU files, Comp Plan amendments from June 30, 2007 through October 31, 2007. The updates made to the FLU file included updating of Comprehensive Future Land use changes both small and large scale for the relevant time period. A query was received from DCA that contained all adopted FLU amendments for the six counties that were included in this release. The query contained information about the amendment including Jurisdiction, DCA number, Mod FLU, County, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, and any additional notes. Lake County is still in the process be being updated based on a new parcel file that was released. The county managed area has been worked in this process, but the individual jurisdictions are still undergoing the process. Also the Right of way (roads) for the county have NOT been filled based on adjacent FLU category. Amendments that were found Not In Compliance by DCA were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process that included checking for spelling errors and ensuring that all relevant files were properly populated. This also includes checking the abbreviations for the GEN_FLU field. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The future land use file has been updated based on comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of November 1st through December 31st 2007 (4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small scale comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. The Lake County file has undergone a complete parcel restructuring. The Lake County parcel file was received directly from the county and included all future land use for the unincorporated areas, this file was updated until early December. This file served as the base for the ECFRPC to recreate the Future Land Use map for the county. Future Land Use codes were gained from the county and used to identify the correct FLU characteristics for the fields. Once populated, the ECFRPC created fields that allowed for a regional future land use field to be created. A crosswalk table detailing the characteristics of each field is available from the RPC. Upon completion of the county file being created, all jurisdictional FLU files existing in the past release (LakeCounty_GENFLU_2007_Q2) were added to the file. The ECFRPC is continuing to process the individual features and will be updating each of the jurisdictions individually to correct overlaps and any gaps that may be present in the files. These changes will be reflected in future releases. Water bodies and the Wekiva River area will also be completed to ensure gaps are corrected in future updates. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.623.1075 ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The future land use file has been updated based on comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31st 2008 (1Qt 2008). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small scale comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. Lake County has recently undergone parcel realignment. The parcel file containing the Flu2025 was received from the county. This file served as the base for the realignment of the Regional FLU file. Lake County jurisdiction was populated with the values from the parcel file. All comp plans that received a notice of intent prior to the July of last year were added into the county file to be sure that no updates were missed. The jurisdictions were then added as overlay to the file. This process created several overlaps between discrepancies between the County FLU file and the ECFRPC GENFLU file. These overlaps that occurred strictly in a county to county level were addressed first. The jurisdictional update was then conducted. The order in which the jurisdictions were completed was based on the response order the cities responded to the data request. All comprehensive plan updates for Lake County and its jurisdictions that were newer than the maps or shapefiles sent by the jurisdictions were transferred into the file here to reflect the most accurate and up to date Future Land Use. The City of Clermont was the first to respond and subsequently was the first city updated. The city sent the ECFRPC their FLU shapefiles for the city. These FLU files were then used to perform an erase from the county FLU file to create a hole for the jurisdiction to fit into. Once the erase tool had been completed, the proper fields from the city, which had been populated to include the local jurisdictions FLU were merged back into the file. Once the files had been merged, a manual process was conducted by the ECFRPC to remove any additional lands that had been accidently identified as belonging to the city. Through this process the city was updated based on the best FLU data available for Clermont. All situations that occurred outside of the city limit boundaries identified by the city were replaced by the FLU value from the county jurisdiction. This shapefile was included in the 2007 4QT. Release. All other jurisdiction were included in the subsequent release. The city of Astatula was updated based on a shapefile received from the city. Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU classification based on the Lake County Parcels file. The city of Eustis was updated based on a shapefile received from the city. Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU classification based on the Lake County Parcels file. The City of Fruitland Park did not have shapefiles available at the time of this update. The city was able to provide the most recent version of the Future Land Use map that they had. This map was then georeferenced into the background with the parcels file overlaid. The FLU classification was then checked against the cities map to ensure that the FLU for the city matched as close as possible the FLU classifications in the file. All lands that were outside of the indicated city boundaries, unless specifically altered by a recent comprehensive plan were then given the corresponding value of the 2025 Lake County FLU file. The city of Groveland was updated based on a shapefile received from the city. Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU classification based on the Lake County Parcels file. The City of Howey in the Hills did not have shapefiles available at the time of this update. The city was able to provide the most recent version of the Future Land Use map that they had. This map was then georeferenced into the background with the parcels file overlaid. The FLU classification was then checked against the cities map to ensure that the FLU for the city matched as close as possible the FLU classifications in the file. All lands that were outside of the indicated city boundaries, unless specifically altered by a recent comprehensive plan were then given the corresponding value of the 2025 Lake County FLU file. The City of Lady Lake did not have shapefiles available at the time of this update. The city was able to provide the most recent version of the Future Land Use map that they had. This map was then georeferenced into the background with the parcels file overlaid. The FLU classification was then checked against the cities map to ensure that the FLU for the city matched as close as possible the FLU classifications in the file. All lands that were outside of the indicated city boundaries, unless specifically altered by a recent comprehensive plan were then given the corresponding value of the 2025 Lake County FLU file. The city of Leesburg was updated based on a shapefile received from the city. Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU classification based on the Lake County Parcels file. The City of Mascotte did not have shapefiles available at the time of this update. The city was able to provide the most recent version of the Future Land Use map that they had. This map was then georeferenced into the background with the parcels file overlaid. The FLU classification was then checked against the cities map to ensure that the FLU for the city matched as close as possible the FLU classifications in the file. All lands that were outside of the indicated city boundaries, unless specifically altered by a recent comprehensive plan were then given the corresponding value of the 2025 Lake County FLU file. The city of Minneola was updated based on a shapefile received from the city. Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU classification based on the Lake County Parcels file. The city of Monteverde was updated based on a shapefile received from the city. Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU classification based on the Lake County Parcels file. The city of Mount Dora was updated based on a shapefile received from the city. Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU classification based on the Lake County Parcels file. The city of Tavares was updated based on a shapefile received from the city. Certain fields were added by the ECFRPC to allow for inclusion in the regional file. The file was then erased against the county file that was currently in place. This created a matching gap for the city which was then plugged into the gap. All additional parcels outside of the city limits were given the FLU classification based on the Lake County Parcels file. The City of Umatilla did not have shapefiles available at the time of this update. The city was able to provide the most recent version of the Future Land Use map that they had. This map was then georeferenced into the background with the parcels file overlaid. The FLU classification was then checked against the cities map to ensure that the FLU for the city matched as close as possible the FLU classifications in the file. All lands that were outside of the indicated city boundaries, unless specifically altered by a recent comprehensive plan were then given the corresponding value of the 2025 Lake County FLU file. Upon Completion of the jurisdiction updates. The file underwent a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC to remove sliver polygons, avoid duplication where possible, and to check for any additional conflict areas that need to be resolved. Overlaps occurring within the individual jurisdictions were identified where possible and cleaned. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through July 1st, 2008 (2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31st, 2008 (1Qt and 2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. A few sliver polygons and gaps were found, these were digitized and merged back into the file as seen accordingly. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2008 (3Qt and 4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. A few sliver polygons and gaps were found, these were digitized and merged back into the file as seen accordingly. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through June 30th, 2009 (1Qt and 2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. A few sliver polygons and gaps were found, these were digitized and merged back into the file as seen accordingly. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st through September 30th, 2009 (3Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of October 1st through December 31th, 2009 (4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The city of Clermont was redone in March 2010 to reflect an updated comprehensive plan rewrite. Clermont 09-1 was approved by DCA in August of 2009. This comprehensive plan saw a complete rewriting of the future land use element. This file has been updated based on the FLU file that was received after contacting the city of Clermont in Feb 2010, the file that was sent from the city reflects the changes from Clermont 09-1. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: K:\PROGRAMS\GISWorking\OnGoingProjects\FLU\LakeCo_FLU\LakeCounty_GENFLU_2009_4qt Process_Date: 20100308 Process_Time: 12395400 ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2010 (1Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. A large scale amendment to the Wekiva Area from 4th quarter 2009 was included in this update resulting in a large number of changes to the file. There were 5 large scale comprehensive plan changes, 5730 large scale map changes and 11 small scale changes in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. There were 2 large scale comprehensive plan changes and 5 small scale changes in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31th, 2010 (3QT & 4QT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. There were 8 large scale comprehensive plan changes and 7 small scale changes in this update, including a complete FLU change in the city of Howey-In-the-hills. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2011 (1QT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. There were 4 large scale comprehensive plan changes and 7 small scale changes in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2011 (2QT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. There were 0 large scale comprehensive plan changes and 0 small scale changes in this update, resulting in no changes for this amendment cycle. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: Dataset copied. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: K:\PROGRAMS\GISWorking\OnGoingProjects\FLU\LakeCo_FLU\Working\LakeCounty_GENFLU_ 2011_2QT Process_Date: 20110909 Process_Time: 10235800 ---------------Process_Step (Lake): Process_Description: Dataset copied. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: Process_Date: 20120103 Process_Time: 15262800 ECFRPC ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Brevard County, Cape Canaveral, Cocoa, Cocoa Beach, Indialantic, Indian Harbor Beach, Malabar, Melbourne, Melbourne Beach, Melbourne Village, Palm Bay, Palm Shores, Rockledge, Satellite Beach, Titusville and West Melbourne. Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet. Aligned future land use polygons using parcels file from March 2004 as basemap. Cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use polygons. Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use categories for Central Florida region. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32701 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788 Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION * Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December 2004. * Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff. * Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005. * Release date: September 5, 2005. * Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for data covering the specified calendar year. * Document sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange, Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update. * Processing methodology: - First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended. - Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial photographs were used as visual reference. - Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU / Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date Mod field updated with the date of the updating. - Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: physical address Address: 631 N. Wymore Rd # 100 City: Maitland State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32751 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: (407) 623-1075 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (407) 623-1084 Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: New Updating Process Steps Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original file ECFRPC 2005 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the shape file. Geometry of file was repaired. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original file ECFRPC 2006 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel layer (2006) were used for reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies (including attribute format and field names) were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the shape file. The county has released a newly realigned parcel shapefile for 2007. Several areas will be revisited to align the Future Land Use data with this new parcel file. However, the FLU classifications are still correct. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: K:\PROGRAMS\CFGIS\FLUMs\112005\BREVARD\BrevardCounty_2005_B_Notes.shp.xml ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: Updated FLU files, Comp Plan amendments from April 1, 2007 - June 30, 2007. The updates made to the FLU file included updating of Comprehensive Future Landuse changes both small and large scale for the relevant time period. A query was received from DCA that contained all adopted FLU amendments for the nine counties that were included in this release. The query contained information about the amendment including Jurisdiction, DCA number, Mod FLU, County, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, and any additional notes. Brevard County FLU file has also undergone a FLU realignment by the newest Parcel file available (2007). The realignment began in April 2007 and should be completed by the end of 2007. The realignment has been conducted by using the new parcel file to adjust the FLU file. Amendments that were found Not In Compliance by DCA were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process that included checking for spelling errors and ensuring that all relevant files were properly populated. This also includes checking the abbreviations for the GEN_FLU field. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: Updated FLU files, Comp Plan amendments from June 30, 2007 through October 31, 2007. The updates made to the FLU file included updating of Comprehensive Future Land use changes both small and large scale for the relevant time period. A query was received from DCA that contained all adopted FLU amendments for the six counties that were included in this release. The query contained information about the amendment including Jurisdiction, DCA number, Mod FLU, County, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, and any additional notes. Brevard County FLU file has also undergone a FLU realignment by the newest Parcel file available (2007). The realignment began in April 2007 and should be completed by the end of 2007. The realignment has been conducted by using the new parcel file to adjust the FLU file. Amendments that were found Not In Compliance by DCA were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process that included checking for spelling errors and ensuring that all relevant files were properly populated. This also includes checking the abbreviations for the GEN_FLU field. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of November 1st through December 31st, 2007 (4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. Brevard County FLU has undergone a realignment based on the most recent parcel file from Brevard County. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through April 1st, 2008 (1Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through July 1st, 2008 (2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2008 (3Qt and 4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. One large area was found to be a hole, it was digitized and this polygon was added back into the file as unknown until further information can be provided. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: Process description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through June 31st, 2009 (1Qt and 2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. One large area was found to be a hole, it was digitized and this polygon was added back into the file as unknown until further information can be provided. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st through September 30th, 2009 (3Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent December 31th, 2009 (4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent of January 1st, 2010 through March 31th, 2010 (1Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: ECFRPC Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: Florida Postal_Code: 32701 Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent of April 1st, 2010 through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. In total for Brevard County there were 0 large scale amendments and 1 small scale change. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent of July 1st, 2010 through December 31th, 2010 (3Qt & 4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. In total for Brevard County there were 4 future land use changes by large scale amendments and 6 small scale change. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent of January 1st, 2011 through March 31th, 2011 (1stQt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. In total for Brevard County there were 4 future land use changes by large scale amendments and 1 small scale change. ---------------Process_Step (Brevard): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent of April 1st, 2011 through June 30th, 2011 (2ndQt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. In total for Brevard County there were 4 future land use changes by large scale amendments and 0 small scale change. ECFRPC ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Flagler County, Flagler Beach, Beverly Beach, Marineland, Palm Coast and Bunnell. Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet. Created, cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use polygons. Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use categories for Central Florida region. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32701 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788 Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION * Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December 2004. * Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff. * Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005. * Release date: September 5, 2005. * Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for data covering the specified calendar year. * Document_ sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange, Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update. * Processing methodology: - First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as _ reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended. - Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial photographs were used as visual reference. - Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU / Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date Mod field updated with the date of the updating. - Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 631 N. Wymore Rd Suite 100 City: Maitland State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32751 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: (407) 623-1075 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (407) 623-1084 Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original file ECFRPC 2006 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. Most of the comprehensive plans were obtained from the DCA Florida Papers data warehouse. The web address is http://dcaenterprise.eoconline.org/. Those FLU amendments that were not available on this website were obtained directly from the local jurisdiction. The most up to date parcel layer (2005) was used for reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized and the DATE_MOD attributes were checked for format consistency. Where any polygons were not aligned with parcel shapefile, they were reshaped based on a FLU map received from the planning department of Flagler County used for reference. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the shape file. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from Apr 1, 2007- June 30, 2007. The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from June 30, 2007 through December 31, 2007 (3Qt and 4Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC. The City of BUNNELL FLU map was obtained by the ECFRPC and the area of the city has been created from the FLUM received. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from January 1, 2008 through April 1, 2008 (1Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from April 1, 2008 through July 1, 2008 (2Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. All queries received from DCA included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, genFLU, DCA number, large or small scale, and the actual land use change. File was updated Dec 23, 2008. Flagler had empty polygons in areas that were pertaining to water, as well as overlapping polygons for conservation areas. We realigned these polygons and digitized new ones for canals and water bodies, however we may revisit these again in the future. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from July 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 (3Qt and 4Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. All queries received from DCA included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, genFLU, DCA number, large or small scale, and the actual land use change. File was updated in December of 2008. Flagler has a few areas that may need to be realigned in the future. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from January 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009 (1Qt and 2Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of Notice of Intents from FDOT. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. All queries received from FDOT included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, genFLU, DCA number, large scale, and the actual land use change. File was updated in August of 2009. This update did not include small scale changes as this data is not available through FDOT. Flagler has a few areas that may need to be realigned in the future. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: Flagler County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from July 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009 (3Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of Notice of Intents from FDOT. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. All queries received from FDOT included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, genFLU, DCA number, large scale, and the actual land use change. This update did not include small scale changes as this data is not available through FDOT. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: This update is relevant from October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 (4Qt). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. Process_Date: 20100208 Process_Time: 09444600 ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: This update is relevant from January 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010 (1Qt). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: ECFRPC Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: Florida Postal_Code: 32701 Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: This update is relevant from April 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010 (2Qt). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: This update is relevant from July 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 (3QT & 4QT). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: This update is relevant from January 1, 2011 through March 31st, 2011 (1QT). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: This update is relevant from April 1, 2011 through June 30st, 2011 (2QT). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: Dataset copied. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: K:\PROGRAMS\GISWorking\OnGoingProjects\FLU\Flagler_FLU\Working\FlaglerCounty_GEN FLU_2011_2QT Process_Date: 20110909 Process_Time: 08491600 ---------------Process_Step (Flagler): Process_Description: Dataset copied. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: Process_Date: 20120103 Process_Time: 15192200 ECFRPC ---------------Process_Step (Volusia): Process_Description: For the 2010 3rd and 4th QT update, the Volusia County file has undergone a realignment. The process began by collecting the most recent parcel file from the Volusia County GIS Department, which was from 2010, then collecting the most recent FLU shapefiles for Volusia County, the cities of Daytona Beach, Daytona Beach Shores, DeBary, DeLand, Deltona, Edgewater, Holly Hill, Lake Helen, New Smyrna Beach, Orange City, Ormond Beach, Ponce Inlet, Port Orange & South Daytona . The FLU files for the cities of Oak Hill & Pierson were currently under review and unavailable for this update. The parcel file serves as the base and the parcels are filled in with the FLU designation for the county parcels first. The cities follow. In any instance where the city and county showed a disagreement about the future land use of a parcel, the city's future land use was utilized. For future land use classification that do not follow parcel lines the scale used to cut the shape of the designation was 1 inch = 0.05 miles. Usually conservation designations, when necessary aerial imagery and jpg images are used. The GEN_FLU field is populated based on the generalized future land use categories for Central Florida region. The file is then revised based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 31, 2010 through December 31, 2010 (3rd & 4th Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. There were 8 Large Scale and 7 Small Scale Amendments for this quarter. Amendments whose map changes were already reflected in the file due to the currentness of the source file were not changed. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Volusia): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent from January 1, 2011 through March 31th, 2011 (1stQT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. For this update there were 1 Large Scale Amendments and 2 Small Scale Ordinances. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: K:\PROGRAMS\GISWorking\OnGoingProjects\FLU\Volusia_FLU\VolusiaCounty_GENFLU_2010 _3QT_4QT Process_Date: 20110330 Process_Time: 14170700 ---------------Process_Step (Volusia): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent from April 1, 2011 through June 30th, 2011 (2QT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. For this update there were 5 Large Scale Amendments and 1Small Scale Ordinances. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ECFRPC ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Seminole County, Altamonte Springs, Casselberry, Lake Mary, Longwood, Oviedo, Sanford and Winter Springs. Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet. Aligned future land use polygons using parcels file from January 2004 as basemap. Created, cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use polygons. Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use categories for Central Florida region. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32701 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788 ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION * Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December 2004. * Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff. * Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005. * Release date: September 5, 2005. * Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for data covering the specified calendar year. * Document_ sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange, Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update. * Processing methodology: - First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as _ reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended. - Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial photographs were used as visual reference. - Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU / Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date Mod field updated with the date of the updating. - Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 631 N. Wymore Rd Suite 100 City: Maitland State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32751 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: (407) 623-1075 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (407) 623-1084 Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: New Updating Process Steps Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original file ECFRPC 2005 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the shape file. Geometry of file was repaired. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original file ECFRPC 2006 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel layer (2005) was used for reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized and the DATE_MOD attributes were checked for format consistency. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the shape file. We are awaiting a reengineered parcel shapefile for Seminole County. Upon reception of said file we will be realigning several areas to assure that there is alignment with this FLU shapefile to within two feet of accuracy. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: This update is relevant from Apr 1, 2007- June 30, 2007. The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC. Seminole County recently redrew there parcel lines. The updates that were completed in this series base the FLU changes on these new parcel lines, However because of the redraw of the counties parcels, if the most recent parcel file is used (2007) the county FLU file will appear to have shifted. The realignment of Seminole County will not occur until the county has been able to successfully change all of their files to reflect this new change. Using the Seminole County parcel file from 2005 or older will allow for the FLU files to align properly with the parcel files. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: Updated FLU files, Comp Plan amendments from June 30, 2007 through October 31, 2007. The updates made to the FLU file included updating of Comprehensive Future Land use changes both small and large scale for the relevant time period. A query was received from DCA that contained all adopted FLU amendments for the six counties that were included in this release. The query contained information about the amendment including Jurisdiction, DCA number, Mod FLU, County, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, and any additional notes. Amendments that were found Not In Compliance by DCA were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process that included checking for spelling errors and ensuring that all relevant files were properly populated. This also includes checking the abbreviations for the GEN_FLU field. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of November 1st through December 31st, 2007 (4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through April 1st, 2008 (1Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through July 1st, 2008 (1Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC. This Future Land Use file has undergone a complete parcel realignment during this update process. The process was initially began by contacting the Seminole County GIS department and receiving the most current parcel file (Jan 2008). This parcel file served as the base for all updates occurring to the future land use map. Seminole County GIS then provided the FLU file for the entire county. All values occurring in the county were then added to the parcel file which had the additional required fields associated with the ECFRPC regional future land use field classifications. Once the counties FLU had been added to the parcel file, each additional jurisdiction in the county was contacted and the most recent future land use map or shapefiles were sent to the ECFRPC. For consistency the ECFRPC continued to use the Seminole County parcel file as the base and populated the fields in the parcel file with the information attained from each city. Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Longwood, Oviedo, Sanford, and Winter Springs all provided GIS shapefiles of the city’s Future Land Use. The city of Casselberry directed the ECFRPC to download its most up to date FLU map from the cities website. The future land use file was then used to populate the parcel file, providing a completed and consistent future land use file for the county. In any instance where the city and county showed a disagreement about the future land use of a parcel, the city’s future land use was utilized unless a previous comprehensive plan had been adopted. For each of the previously noted comprehensive plans that had been entered by the ECFRPC, the future land for the parcel was compared to the comprehensive plan and depending on date of last update was changed to reflect the comprehensive plan change. The counties parcel file in many instances did not contain either right of way locations or in some instances water bodies. As a final step the ECFRPC using the county boundary, performed an erase against the completed parcel file in order to locate any gaps occurring in the file. This erased file was then merged back into the parcel file to give a complete contiguous GIS file. All values added in through this process and not having been given a future land use classification were then entered as unknown in the future land use table. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2008 (3Qt and 4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through June 30th, 2009 (1Qt and 2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st through September 30th, 2009 (3Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of October 1st through December 31th, 2009 (4Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of January 1st through March 31th, 2010 (1Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: ecfrpc Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 cranes roost Blvd. Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: Florida Postal_Code: 32701 Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. For this update there were 0 Large Scale Amendments and 10 Small Scale Ordinances. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2010 (3QT & 4QT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. For this update there were 13 Large Scale Amendments and 12 Small Scale Ordinances. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent March 31th, 2011 (1stQT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. For this update there were 16 Large Scale Amendments and 4 Small Scale Ordinances. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Seminole): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent June 30th, 2011 (2ndQT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. For this update there were 1 Large Scale Amendments and 0 Small Scale Ordinances. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ECFRPC ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: Collected future land use maps and/or shapefiles from Sumter County, Bushnell, Center Hill, Coleman, Webster and Wildwood. Reprojected data sets into State Plane Florida East NAD 83, feet. Created, cut and reclassified right-of-way based on adjacent future land use polygons. Reclassified future land use polygons based on generalized future land use categories for Central Florida region. Sumter has a few areas that may need to be considered for realignment in the future Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32701 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788 ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: UPDATING PROCESS DESCRIPTION * Original data source: ECFRPC generalized Future Land Use file dated December 2004. * Update by: (1) GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. for East Central Florida Regional Planning Council and (2) ECFRPC staff. * Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to September 1, 2005. * Release date: September 5, 2005. * Update status: First update of generalized Future Land Use GIS data for District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. The shapefile name includes the reference letter A or B corresponding to the first or second release for data covering the specified calendar year. * Document_ sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange, Osceola, Seminole and Volusia Counties. _ All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter Counties. Adopted comprehensive plan amendments found not in compliance by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) were not included in the update. * Processing methodology: - First step: Major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as _ reference points to locate Future Land Use polygons to be amended. - Second step: Amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons using snapping and cutting tools available in ArcMap, to match adopted ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial photographs were used as visual reference. - Third step: Attribute table updated with the corresponding Original FLU / Modified FLU and Generalized FLU information. DCA Number attribute populated with the corresponding amendment number provided by DCA, when available. Date Mod field updated with the date of the updating. - Final step: General QA/QC of both geometry and attributes. Metadata for ECFRPC LU Project. Original data source: Downloaded from cfgis.org website, on May 1, 2005. GIS tasks force: GMB Engineers and Planners, Inc. For East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Update processing time: From May 1, 2005 to August 5, 2005. Release date: August 8, 2005. Update statues: First update of Future Land Use GIS data for District 5, Florida Department of Transportation. Documents sources: All adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the ECFRPC from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Brevard, Lake, Orange, Osceola, Seminole and Volusia County. Used all adopted comprehensive plan amendments received by the FDOT District Five planning office from December 1, 2003 to March 31, 2005 for Flagler, Marion and Sumter County. All comprehensive plan amendments are in compliance by Florida Department of Community Affairs. Processing methodology: Used ESRI ArcGIS 9.1 software to update the shapefiles. First step, major roads, local roads and parcel shape-files were used as a reference points to locate future land use polygons to be amended. Second step, amendment descriptions were used to make changes on the polygons using cutting tool in ArcMap, to match adopted ordinance. In case of multiple land use changes in one polygon, aerial pictures were used as visual references. Final step amended polygons were labeled with the corresponding East Central Florida Planning Council and DCA number, when available. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 631 N. Wymore Rd Suite 100 City: Maitland State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32751 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: (407) 623-1075 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (407) 623-1084 Hours_of_Service: 8:30 am to 5:00 pm ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: New Updating Process Steps Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original file ECFRPC 2005 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. The most up to date parcel layer (2005) were used for reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the shape file. Geometry of file was repaired. ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: Process steps for updating the Generalized FLU file has been modified. Original file ECFRPC 2006 file. Using list of adopted amendments from ECFRPC and the comprehensive plans, updates to the FLU files were made which included polygon manipulation and/or changing the ORIG, MOD and GEN FLU classifications. Most of the comprehensive plans were obtained from the DCA Florida Papers data warehouse. The web address is http://dcaenterprise.eoconline.org/. Those FLU amendments that were not available on this website were obtained directly from the local jurisdiction. The most up to date parcel layer (2005) was used for reference and snapping. Once all updates as per adopted comprehensive plan amendments were completed, the attribute table was QC'ed to ensure all classifications were consistent based on FLU categories for each jurisdiction. This included ensuring that the ORIG and MOD flu classifications were correctly spelled and abbreviated and the correct GEN FLU was assigned for all categories. This was done by <DISSOLVING> the attribute table based on JURIS, MOD, GEN, and ORIG FLU. Any discrepancies were checked and corrected. Also, all fields were capitalized and the DATE_MOD attributes were checked for format consistency. A query from DCA was obtained which included all adopted FLU amendments for the 9 counties which included jurisdiction, county, DCA number, Date Amendment was received, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres. Then the query was compared to the ECFRPC list and the correct DCA numbers were given to the appropriate ECFRPC numbers which were added to the "DCA Number" field in the shape file. ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: This update is relevant from Apr 1, 2007- June 30, 2007. The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: This update is relevant from June 30, 2007- December 31, 2007 (3Qt and 4Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC. Several Comprehensive plans were unable to be included in this update. They include: Wildwood 07S01, o7S02,07S03,07S04,07S05,07S06. ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: This update is relevant from January 1, 2008 - April 1, 2008 (1Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments from DCA. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. The jurisdictions were updated separately. All queries received from DCA for the 9 county area included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, notes and acres for the parcels in question. A GIS number was added later by the ECFRPC. ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: This update is relevant from April 1, 2008 to July 1, 2008 (2QT). The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments published by DCA. Only amendments adopted and in compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment. Sumter County queries from DCA included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, and land use change. ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: This update is relevant from July 1, 2008 to December 31st (3QT and 4QT). The file has been updated by using a list of the adopted amendments published by DCA. Only amendments adopted and in compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment. Sumter County queries from DCA included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, DCA number, number of amendments, large or small scale, and land use change. ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: Sumter County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from January 1, 2009 through June 30, 2009 (1Qt and 2Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of Notice of Intents from FDOT. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. All queries received from FDOT included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, genFLU, DCA number, large scale, and the actual land use change. File was updated in August of 2009. This update did not include small scale changes as this data is not available through FDOT. Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: K:\PROGRAMS\GISWorking\OnGoingProjects\FLU\Sumter_FLU\Working\SumterCounty_GENFL U_2008_3QT_and_4Qt Process_Date: 20090901 Process_Time: 12165600 ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: Sumter County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from June 1, 2009 through September 30, 2009 (3Qt). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: This update is relevant from October 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009 (4Qt). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: This update is relevant from January 1, 2010 through March 31, 2010 (1Qt). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: ECFRPC Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: Florida Postal_Code: 32701 Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: This update is relevant from April 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010 (2Qt). There was 1 Large Scale Amendment and 0 Small Scale Amendments. ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: Sumter County Future Land Use update. This update is relevant from July 1, 2010 through December 31, 2010 (3Qt and 4Qt). The file has been updated by using a list of Notice of Intents from FDOT. Only amendments found In Compliance were included in this update. The most up to date parcel file was used to help in referencing the parcels that were undergoing a change from the Future Land Use amendment changes. All queries received from FDOT included jurisdiction, Mod FLU, genFLU, DCA number, large scale, and the actual land use change. This update included 1 large scale and 0 small scale changes. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: This update is relevant from January 1, 2011 through March 31st, 2011 (1QT). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. ---------------Process_Step (Sumter): Process_Description: This update is relevant from April 1, 2011 through June 30st, 2011 (2QT). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. ECFRPC ---------------Process_Step (Marion): Process_Description: For the 2010 1st QT update to the Marion County file has undergone a realignment. The process began by collecting the most recent parcel file from the Marion County Property Appraisers Office, which was from 2008, then collecting the most recent FLU shapefiles from Marion County, the cities of Belleview, Dunnellon, and Ocala. The cities of McIntosh and Reddick were received from the Withlacoochee Regional Planning Council in a PDF format. The parcel file serves as the base and the parcels are filled in with the FLU designation for the county parcels first. The cities follow. In any instance where the city and county showed a disagreement about the future land use of a parcel, the city's future land use was utilized. For future land use classification that do not follow parcel lines the scale used to cut the shape of the designation was 1 inch = 0.05 miles. Usually conservation designations, when necessary aerial imagery and jpg images are used. The GEN_FLU field is populated based on the generalized future land use categories for Central Florida region. Process_Contact: Contact_Information: Contact_Organization_Primary: Contact_Organization: East Central Florida Regional Planning Council Contact_Address: Address_Type: mailing and physical address Address: 309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000 City: Altamonte Springs State_or_Province: FL Postal_Code: 32701 Country: US Contact_Voice_Telephone: 407.262.7772 Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 407.262.7788 ---------------Process_Step (Marion): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of April 1st through June 30th, 2010 (2Qt). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. There were 0 Large Scale and 0 Small Scale Amendments for this quarter. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Marion): Process_Description: The Future Landuse file has been updated based on received comprehensive plans with a Notice of Intent received at the East Central Florida Regional Planning Council between the dates of July 1st through December 31st, 2010 (3QT & 4QT). The changes made to the FLU files include updating both large and small comprehensive plan changes. Amendments found "Not In Compliance" or not receiving a notice of intent during the relative time period were not included in this update. There were 2 Large Scale and 0 Small Scale Amendments for this quarter. This file has undergone a QA/QC process by the ECFRPC ONLY. ---------------Process_Step (Marion): Process_Description: This update is relevant from January 1, 2011 through March 31th, 2011 (1QT). There were no Notice of Intents from FDOT filed for this time period, thus no updates were made to this dataset for the relevant time period. ---------------Process_Step (Marion): Process_Description: This update is relevant from April 1, 2011 through June 31th, 2011 (2QT). There were 3 NOI's file in Marion County with only one of the Amendments containing changed to the Future Land Use element. The single comprehensive plan contained 49 amendments. ECFRPC GeoPlan downloaded this data from http://cfgis.org/ on 12/13/2011. The data was downloaded in shapefile format. The original data was projected in State Plane FL East - Nad83. The data was projected to Albers HPGN. The following 9 shapefiles were downloaded and merged: BrevardCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp FlaglerCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp LakeCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp MarionCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp OrangeCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp OsceolaCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp SeminoleCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp SumterCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp VolusiaCounty_GENFLU_2011_2QT.shp In order to get the schemas from all layers to match for merge operation, the following changes were made: -changed ORG_FLU to ORIG_FLU - Lake, Seminole, Volusia -added COUNTY field and calced with fips code: Seminole: 117 Volusia: 127 -deleted ORIG_FID from: Osceola, Volusia In order not to lose original metadata, the process steps from each original metadata were copied to an individual process step in the new merged dataset. -Ran repair geometry multiple times with ArcGIS 9.3.1 -Added DESCRIPT field based on: GEN_FLU -Added FGDLAQDATE based on date data downloaded -Named new layer ecfrpc_genflu_2011 GeoPlan 20120106 Ran the dissolve command in ArcGIS 9.3.1. Dissolve was based on the following fields: JURIS, MOD_FLU, GEN_FLU, DATE_MOD, COUNTY, DESCRIPT, FGDLAQDATE. Single part shapes were preserved. After dissolving, record count decreased from 157655 to 98072 GeoPlan 20120227 Vector GT-polygon composed of chains 98072 NAD 1983 HARN Florida GDL Albers 24.0 31.5 -84.0 24.0 400000.0 0.0 coordinate pair 0.0001 0.0001 meter D North American 1983 HARN GRS 1980 6378137.0 298.257222101 ECFRPC_GENFLU_2011 ECFRPC_GENFLU_2011.DBF East Central Florida Regional Planning Council OBJECTID Internal feature number. ESRI Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated. Shape Feature geometry ESRI Coordinates defining the features. JURIS Jurisdiction MOD_FLU Future land use categories from source files/maps. These modified future land use categories were developed from ORIG_FLU field, but right-of-way polygons were reclassified to adjacent future land uses GEN_FLU Generalized future land use categories - See overview ECFRPC RH High Density Residential - Residential development where the maximum allowable density exceeds approximately 12 units per acre * RM Medium Density Residential - Residential development up to approximately 12 units per acre, but generally greater than that allowed in the Low Density Residential category * RL Low Density Residential - Residential development up to approximately 5 units per acre, but greater than that allowed in the Very Low Density Residential category * RVL Very Low Density Residential - Residential development of less than two units per acre, but greater than that allowed in the Rural Residential category * RR Rural Residential - Residential development not to exceed one unit for every two acres * AG Agricultural - Land specifically designated as Agricultural in the comprehensive plan. May include silvicultural uses in some cases. REC Recreation / Open Space CONS Conservation - Includes any Wetlands categories. INST Institutional IND Industrial OFF Office COM Commercial LOD Hotel / Motel / Timeshare - Most Future Land Use Maps do not include these uses. Includes RV parks if in separate category. PD Planned Development FED Military / Federal - Federal lands in unincorporated Brevard County encompassing Kennedy Space Center, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, and the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge MU Mixed Use WAT Water Body - Not all Future Land Use Maps include water as a category. In these cases, water bodies include a land use for an adjacent use. UNK Unknown - Information not available DATE_MOD Date modified ECFRPC COUNTY FIPS County Code ECFRPC DESCRIPT GeoPlan added field based on GEN_FLU. This field represents an abbreviated description, for a full description please see the attribute definition for GEN_FLU GeoPlan FGDLAQDATE Date GeoPlan acquired data from source. GeoPlan SHAPE_Leng AUTOID Unique ID added by GeoPlan GeoPlan SHAPE.AREA Area in meters GeoPlan SHAPE.LEN Perimeter in meters GeoPlan Generalized Future Land Use Categories Definition. (GEN_FLU) * Residential classifications should be determined individually for each local government to ensure the best fit with the generalized categories. For example, if City X has categories for 1 - 3 units per acre, 3+ - 9 units per acre, and 9+ - 15 units per acre, these would be classified as Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, and High Density Residential. If City Y has categories for 1 - 2.5 units per acre, 2.5+ - 6 units per acre, and 6+ - 14 units per acre, these would be classified as Low Density Residential, Low Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential - there would be no High Density Residential for this city. Note: Roads do not appear as a land use on the generalized Future Land Use Map. Users may need to overlay water, wetlands, and or right-of-way layers for certain uses such as calculating developable land. Florida Geographic Data Library (FGDL) mailing

431 Architecture PO Box 115706

Gainesville Florida 32611-5706 US Mailing list for FGDL: http://www.fgdl.org/fgdl-l.html Web site: http://www.fgdl.org For FGDL Software: http://www.fgdl.org/software.html FGDL Frequently Asked Questions: http://www.fgdl.org/fgdlfaq.html Technical Support: http://www.fgdl.org/fgdlfeed.html DOWNLOADABLE DATA The Florida Geographic Data Library is a collection of Geospatial Data compiled by the University of Florida GeoPlan Center with support from the Florida Department of Transportation. GIS data available in FGDL is collected from various state, federal, and other agencies (data sources) who are data stewards, producers, or publishers. The data available in FGDL may not be the most current version of the data offered by the data source. University of Florida GeoPlan Center makes no guarantees about the currentness of the data and suggests that data users check with the data source to see if more recent versions of the data exist. Furthermore, the GIS data available in the FGDL are provided 'as is'. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center makes no warranties, guaranties or representations as to the truth, accuracy or completeness of the data provided by the data sources. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center makes no representations or warranties about the quality or suitability of the materials, either expressly or implied, including but not limited to any implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement. The University of Florida GeoPlan Center shall not be liable for any damages suffered as a result of using, modifying, contributing or distributing the materials. A note about data scale: Scale is an important factor in data usage. Certain scale datasets are not suitable for some project, analysis, or modeling purposes. Please be sure you are using the best available data. 1:24000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the county level. 1:24000 data should NOT be used for high accuracy base mapping such as property parcel boundaries. 1:100000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the multi-county or regional level. 1:125000 scale datasets are recommended for projects that are at the regional or state level or larger. Vector datasets with no defined scale or accuracy should be considered suspect. Make sure you are familiar with your data before using it for projects or analysis. Every effort has been made to supply the user with data documentation. For additional information, see the References section and the Data Source Contact section of this documentation. For more information regarding scale and accuracy, see our webpage at: http://geoplan.ufl.edu/education.html 20200302 East Central Florida Regional Planning Council GIS Manager mailing and physical

309 Cranes Roost Blvd. Suite 2000

Altamonte Springs FL 32701 407.262.7772 407.262.7788 Monday to Friday / 8:30 AM - 5:00 PM FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata FGDC-STD-001-1998 local time